186,000 miles per second, it’s not just a good idea, it’s the law.
Ok, so the other day, I read a blog entry on TUAW which discussed a cost comparison between the 17” MacBook Pro and the Dell XPS M1710. I didn’t think the comparison was comprehensive enough, so I took it upon myself to do my own.
On the Mac side, I chose one from each of the 3 flavors of portables — the MacBook, the 15” MacBook Pro and the 17” MacBook Pro. Using the specs of those systems as a guide, I selected competing Dell systems that were closest in configuration to those. The only exception was at the 15” size. Dell does not currently offer a 15” notebook that uses a 2.16 Ghz Core 2 Duo processor. As a result, I selected the Thinkpad T60 widescreen version, which offers a 15.4” widescreen with the 2.16 Ghz Core 2 Duo. Further, Dell does not offer a 13.3” system at all, so I selected a 12.1” instead. Choosing the 14” E1405 does not significantly affect the comparison, as the E1405 came in $18 cheaper than the XPS M1210. Rounding out the comparison is the 17” Dell XPS M1710.
All systems have the following options:
Ok, this one’s probably been beaten to death in comparisons, so I’ll be brief. Macs come with iLife, PCs do not. I came up with PC-based alternatives as follows:
| Mac App | Windows App | |
|---|---|---|
| Photo Software | iPhoto | Picasa ($0) |
| Video Editing | iMovie HD | Vegas Movie+DVD Studio ($90) |
| DVD Creation | iDVD | |
| DVD Player | DVD Player | PowerDVD ($38) |
| Webpage Tool | iWeb | Nvu ($0) |
| Music Composition | GarageBand | ACID Music Studio ($70) |
As a result, in this comparison, I’m adding $198 to each PC to pay for the additional 3rd party software.
At the low-end, both systems share a lot of similarities. Both systems are configured as follows (in addition to constants already described above):
In the MacBook’s favor:
In the Dell’s favor:
Immediately, I’d discount the difference in weight due to the smaller screen size of the Dell. Also, it’s great that the Dell provides 802.11a capabilities, but hands up, who actually deploys 802.11a? Yeah, I thought so. What good is the feature if you’ll never have occasion to use it?
Price? The MacBook wins hands down. Based on our pricing criteria, the MacBook prices out at $1548, while the Dell comes in at $1882, and that goes up to $2080 when you level the playing field in terms of additional software needed to match up the feature set. While there are distinct advantages to the Dell, the advantages don’t justify over $500 in higher costs.
Winner: MacBook
In the mid-range, the competition was much closer. At this level, only $27 stand between the competitors. Both systems have (in addition to the standard config detailed above):
In the 15” MacBook Pro’s favor:
In the T60’s favor:
Again, I’m going to discount the 802.11a “feature”. Since Mac OS X doesn’t suffer from the Toolbar/Menubar-itis that Windows brings along with its UI paradigm, the screen size difference is pretty much a wash. With the prices this close, it’s a wash. Go with what you really want. The MacBook Pro came in at $2348, with the T60 weighing in at $2177, $2375 with comparable software features. For my $$, it’s a MacBook Pro.
Winner: Tie.
Now for the big boys. The kings of the hill. These business-class systems are configured (again, other than the standard configs above) as:
17” MacBook Pro advantages:
XPS M1710 advantages:
Price-wise, the 17” MacBook Pro came in at $3148, while the Dell came in at $3493, $3691 after the additional software needed to even up the feature set. At over $500 more than the 17” MacBook Pro, the Dell’s the clear loser here, despite the extra screen real estate and extra USB 2 port.
Winner: 17” MacBook Pro
You’ll probably go on complaining about the $198 in extra software I added to each PC. Well, if they came with software that balances out the equation, it wouldn’t have had to be done, now would it? Be glad I didn’t factor in things like Antivirus, Spyware protection, Personal Firewalls, etc.
You’ll probably also say things like, “But what about the Dell E1505 and E1705? The E1505 is not available in the 2.16 Ghz Core 2 Duo and the E1705 is not available in the 2.33 Ghz Core 2 Duo. Remember, this comparison is about comparing apples with apples, so to speak. If we used a slower PC in the comparison, how exactly would that be fair? Answer: it wouldn’t.
Well, the Windows side went winless in this comparison, but did at least manage a tie at the 15” level. This comparison of course fails to account for the added value that Mac OS X brings to the table — stability, adding devices “just work”, etc. I can’t think of a way to quantify that in terms of $$ or perceived value, so you need to consider those factors for yourself. Here’s the breakdown of costs:

Dying to look over the configurations in detail? Have I got data for you.
Hopefully this has been thorough enough to satisfy everyone. The days of Macs automatically costing more than PCs are over.
Leave a reply